Pushing for Greatness
I think possibly the most difficult thing about being a pastor is getting people to believe God created them for greatness—I’m not saying that there won’t be tragedy or defeat; but to paraphrase Paul in Ephesians, we aren’t saved by good works but for good works!
This week I was teaching from the book of Ruth, chapter 4. Here we see Big Bad Boaz going to the city gates to redeem Ruth. We notice people are praying for Ruth, praying that she would be great like Rachel and Leah. This is the cool part—Ruth brings nothing to the table. She isn’t even present during the redemptive transaction, but yet we see her transitional change from Moabitess to Matriarch due fully and solely to her relationship with the Redeemer.
I challenged the class to grasp onto this redeemed concept and start living as though this is true—to move beyond the elementary principles (such as repentance from dead works) and start focusing on allowing our good works to bring glory to God.
During the small group discussion time, I posed the following question: “What good work or works are going to do this week in recognition of your redeemed position? Or in other words, what is one thing you are you going to do this week to acknowledge that you were created in Christ for good works?”
As I listened to people speak, I couldn’t help but overhear some committing that their good work would be to quit cussing for the week or to quit speaking with sarcasm for the week. . .
Arrgh!!! When will we learn? The old man will not pass away until we put on the new man. We are never told that we will be without sin on this side of heaven, but that remains to steal our focus. We are commanded to love one another, but instead of striving for this, we focus on our own shortcomings. We get stuck. We focus on the things we need to quit doing, dwell on the things we’ve failed at, and fixate on the things we’ve fallen short in. We were created for greatness, yet we refuse to embrace it.
The Training Ground of God
Praise be to the Lord my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1
David was a man skilled in war. From his days as a shepherd boy to the days of serving in Saul’s army to leading his own army, David learned to be a skillful warrior. How does one become a skillful warrior?
The only way one can become a skillful warrior is to be trained and placed in the middle of the battle. It is only when we are placed in the furnace of battle that we truly learn to fight the real battles. Practice doesn’t make you battle ready. War games won’t prepare you for facing your real enemy in the battlefield. The stark reality of being in the midst of the battle makes us effective warriors.
Simply reading your Bible will not make you a warrior for the Kingdom. Knowledge without experience is mere folly. Only when you are placed in situations where there is nothing or no one who can save you but God will you learn the lessons of warrior faith. This is the training ground of God, which will make you into a soldier for Christ. Consider it to be suicidal faith-faith that says I want to be dead to anything that keeps me from fulfilling God’s purposes for my life. It is when your efforts can do nothing to change your circumstances and you are at the mercy of God. These are the real training grounds of God. Do not shrink back from the battle that God may be leading you to today. It may be a training ground that is necessary for the calling He has on your life.
If you can trust Him in these times, you’ll know that you have gained a faith that will move mountains and will sustain you in the most difficult of circumstances. “Praise be to the Lord my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.”
Blessing to all. I wanted to share this awesome writing by Os Hillman with you.
Bourbon Street Hotties get what they need…
In what might prove to be the crowning achievement of an illustrious
Career in ministry, the 87-year-old evangelist, Billy Graham shocked the
16,300 in attendance at the Celebration of Hope Crusade in New
Orleans Arena, Sunday Night. Touted in advance as possibly his last
evangelistic crusade, Graham invited the packed house of evangelical
Christians and the hundreds of new converts to join him on the one mile walk
from the arena to New Orleans’ infamous Bourbon Street.
“While we have seen God do tremendous things here the past couple of
evenings, yes, it is true that a great healing and a great many salvations
have occurred within the confines of this auditorium. Still yet,
there lies a great mountain in this city which needs to be conquered.”
Then taking from the Biblical Book of Joshua, Chapter 14, he read, “I am
this day, eighty-five years old. As yet, I am as strong this Day as on the
day that Moses sent me; just as my strength was then, so now is my strength
for war, both for going out and for coming in. Now therefore, give me this
mountain of which the Lord spoke in that day,” his voice suddenly sounding
more forceful than during his 22 minute sermon.
“I last preached in the City of New Orleans in1954 and I felt then that
there was some unfinished business. Tonight, in what very well might be my
last evangelistic service, I aim to finish that business and lead as
many of you that would follow me to the multitude of lost souls that fill
Bourbon Street tonight. That is my mountain !
That is where we shall see the harvest!” said Graham as the stadium
erupted in cheers that lasted the next several minutes. Utilizing a waiting
mobility scooter, the elder Graham joined his son and heir to the ministry,
Franklin across the Arena floor and through the opened doors leading towards
the French Quarter. In a show of solidarity and determination reminiscent of
civil rights marches of the 1960’s, nearly the entire capacity crowd joined
in the 20 minute trek while singing, “When the Saints Go Marching In”.
As the march crossed Canal Street and headed northward towards Bourbon
Street, many onlookers stood in stunned silence as the massive crowd of
people began singing in unison the Christian hymn, Amazing Grace.
Upon entering the west end of Bourbon Street, Billy Graham was soon
recognized by partiers.
Soon, those joining in the march began to approach those partying on
Bourbon Street with the Gospel message that they had heard preached just a
half hour before. Graham himself joined with a group of local street evangelists in ministering to a man who had survived Hurricane Katrina in the lower 9th Ward.
Within 30 minutes, the entirety of Bourbon Street was packed with
Christians and the once blaring music of nightclubs and strip joints had
been replaced by weeping and worship as people poured out their drinks and
sought prayer from the Christians who were now reaching out to them.
“I have never seen anything like this in my life,” said 20 years New
OrleansPolice Department veteran, Tom Phillips. “This is unbelievable! We
thought a riot was going to break out, but this looks more like a revival
than a riot!”
Two hours later, a glowing Graham sat back down on his scooter and
smiled. “Now I know how the Apostle Paul must have felt at the end of his
ministry. Do the work of an evangelist; make full proof of thy ministry. For
I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand. I
have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith.”
Hours later, hundreds of Christians remained on the street ministering to
the many people eagerly waiting to receive prayer and ministry. New Orleans
will never be the same.
And the press remained mute on this “news item?”
Did anyone see it on TV/hear it on radio/read it in the paper?
Well, unfortunately you didn’t see it because it didn’t happen. As you read the above story, didn’t you think, that is just awesome? I truly believe the only thing keeping an amazing event like this from occuring is us. Let’s get off the side line of being spectators and become God’s players in the game.
A Dissent: The Case Against Faith ( A response Part 1)
Sam Harris is the author of the New York Times best sellers, “Letter to a Christian Nation” and “The End of Faith.” He also recently wrote an article that was published in Newsweek, A Dissent: The Case Against Faith.
When I first read the article in Newsweek, I initially thought ‘here is a guy that is not only bitter - he is either uneducated or ignorant on Faith’. And to be honest, I didn’t think this article would cause much stir. Well, as the weeks have gone by, I have heard more than a few people discussing Sam Harris and his writing. So, I thought, why not take a trip or two down memory lane and see what Sammy is talking about…
Sam’s first point: A Full Century of Scientific Insight
To say this is an uneducated statement would be kind. If you have searched the Internet, or attended a local university, it is easy to see the immense reemergence of creation science. It is becoming obvious that as science develops, there is a greater recognition of the signature of a Creator.
Sam’s second point: a 6000-Year-Old Universe – Light Created En-Route
I can only think that Sam was just trying to bring as much criticism as possible to Creation theories. The age of the earth is a mystery to most and age isn’t as important as its origin. There are some fantastic creation scientists, as well as theologians, who indicate a broad potential range for the age of the earth. I am personally a believer of the 10 –12k year range, which has a tremendous amount of scientific evidence behind it.
Sam’s third point: The First Members of our Species were Fashioned out of Dirt and Divine Breath
Here is the funny part: take away the divine breath and Sam Harris would have no problems with the theory. Sam, is it really easier to believe that we happened by chance out of nothing without causation? Or, maybe you believe that aliens brought us here?
The foundation for the belief or faith, as Sam Harris ascribes, is not science - but an unfounded belief that no God exists. It is from here, this faith in ‘self’, that Humanism seeks to develop a foundation against God’s creation. Here is a Question: does anyone really think we would really be any better without the existence of faith — even theistic faith? Many noted philosophers and theologians have espoused the idea that faith is the basis of all knowledge. One example is St. Augustine of Hippo. Known as one of his key contributions to philosophy, the idea of “faith seeking understanding” was set forth by St. Augustine in his statement “Crede, ut intelligas” (”Believe in order that you may understand”). This statement extends beyond the sphere of religion to encompass the totality of knowledge. In essence, faith must be present in order to know anything. In other words, one must assume, believe, or have faith in the credibility of a person, place, thing, or idea in order to have a basis for knowledge. Check out some of the following links:
My Little Mormon Missionaries (Part 3 salvation)
So, to catch everyone up to speed, in our last visit with the Elders, we focused in on contradictions that I found in regard to the book of Mormon and Joseph Smith. The bottom line was, although the Elders would essentially admit these contradictions - or false prophesies - it was just chalked up to continued revelation.
As it was getting closer to our next visit, my wife asked me what I planned to discuss with the elders. I was thinking that I might examine the call and anointing of the prophets and leaders in Israel as well as does Joseph Smith align and/or measure up with God’s chosen prophets of the past…
The next day I jumped on the computer and was doing a little surfing online. Really by accident, I came across a Mormon apologetics web site that focused specifically on continued revelation. As I read what the Mormons believe, in regard to continued revelation, I was fascinated and befuddled. So, I figured that this would be where I would plant to see if I could drill down and see if their beliefs would hold water.
As the Elders came in and sat down, we wrapped up our small talk and niceties. Honestly, they are both really nice guys! I began sharing with them the definition that I had found that morning, which is: The concept of continuing revelation clearly implies that no mortal knows it all yet. Continuing revelation is needed to correct past ignorance, overcome human errors, and provide new truth and knowledge when the Lord sees fit to give it. As long as there are mortal leaders in the Church, their knowledge and views will not all be based on revelation from God, meaning that they inevitably will have their own human views. The Church fully recognizes this! …according to the Encyclopedia of Mormonism
They were seemingly thrilled! “You got it!” they said. “That’s it!”
“Great,” I said. “at first glance this seems to make a lot of sense. I mean Noah was a drunk, Elijah was depressed, David was a murderer and adulterer, Abraham was a coward and a liar, the list goes on and on”.
“Right, you got it!” they exclaimed again. For a brief moment, we all just looked at each other and smiled. Silence. Next, I explained that I was sorry. I was going to have to break some bad news to them.
“You see, this seems similar because all these men were absolutely sinners, that’s true. But that is where the similarities stop”. I continued to explain, the Bible is the ruler in which we measure truth. Mormonism lacks a ruler. The thinking of Mormonism is circular - at best. Joseph Smith, it turns out, was shown to be a prophet by revealing a supposed truth; however, this truth is not really a truth since it is changing. Yet, according to Mormonism belief, in continued revelation, this confirms his position and anointing because his revelation changed.
One of the elders said, “the Bible reveals the same sort of revelation doesn’t it?”
“No, you see, there is a huge difference in God demonstrating increased clarity in the same revelation and a contradictory revelation. We see in the Old Testament a continued increase in clarity in the Redeemer, His role, His identity and His purpose. Never was there a change in Christ’s purpose. In Mormonism, on the contrary. There are definite changes in core beliefs, and tenants”, I said.
Now, this is the first time that things started getting a little heated throughout our visits. I actually had thought maybe we were actually getting somewhere. They shot back at me saying, “No, you are wrong. Continued revelation is necessary.” I prompted them to point out an example of changing revelation from the Bible, and they couldn’t.
“Let back up a little here, again I have to ask, what is your ruler here?” They had both admitted that prophecy was measured by the results of the specific prophesy; although it did not discredit the prophet in entirety, but just in the prophesy stated. “Well, what about doctrine? I know that Brigham Young said that he was his own measure. He stated that he would proof his own teaching and establish if it was ordained doctrine or not. Is this the standard?” They answered that it was one way of establishing doctrine; another would be a group of the prophets agreeing that the new doctrine or revelation was of God. Again, this is circular in reasoning and it denies absolute truth.
“Do you believe in absolute truth I asked?”
“Yes” said the Elders…
“What is it?”
“Current Mormon Doctrine!”
“Are you sure?”
“Yes!”
“What if there was new revelation that absolutely contradicted the current Mormon doctrine. Would you believe it?”
“NO!!”
(Wow, I think we are getting somewhere here)
“Yes you would, and I can prove it”. At this point, I have to be honest - I wasn’t even sure what I was going to say. Then it hit me… “I am sure you are both familiar with the problems that have occurred with mitochondrial DNA testing and the southern Asia lineage that this points to with the Native Americans” they said they were. “Well, what if a Mormon prophet stood up and said that they received a new revelation that explained the discrepancy. Imagine 1500 years before Christ, a portion of a tribe of Israel traveled to Asia to proclaim the message of the “Heavenly Father” and as these people were proselytized, their DNA was mingled… Then it was these people after hundreds of years that migrated to the Americas”.
It was like I punched the older Elder in the stomach. The younger of the two just started laughing.
“Yes,” the older Elder said.
“Yes what?”
“Yes, I would believe that.”
“Great, that took me two minutes to make up, just by me being willing to twist your beliefs to meet current political and scientific thinking, yet there is no measure of truth to judge it. There has to be a measure — an absolute reliable truth”.
“The thinking of the Mormon Church just doesn’t hold water. Throughout history, God’s message has stayed the same, yet your perspective is that, due to people’s willfull disobedience, God would scrap or disregard His OWN truth. Ever since then, God has not been able to get His own beliefs and thoughts straight. According to your beliefs, God could once again start over with a new Gospel and make both yours and my current beliefs void”.
“No, we don’t believe that God would do that” they said.
“What? No, God would never do that”, said the older of the two.
“But according to Mormonism, God did that very thing with Joseph Smith” I continued.
“Stop your confusing me!” the older said.
The younger missionary laughed.
“I’m sorry if I am confusing you, let’s review”. I went on… “You are saying that God, who says He is the same from everlasting to everlasting, has changed. That the God of decency and order is confused and disorganized”…
Below are a few of the many contradictions we re-established and reviewed.
| The Book of Mormon | Mormon Doctrine |
| There is only one God Mosiah 15:1,5; Alma 11:28; 2 Nephi 31:21 |
Mormonism teaches there are many gods. Joseph Smith, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p. 5 |
| The Trinity is one God Alma 11:44; Mosiah 15:5; 2 Nephi 31:21 |
The Trinity is three separate gods. James Talmage, Articles of Faith, p. 35. 1985. |
| God is unchanging Mormon 9:9,19; Moroni 8:18; Alma 41:8; 3 Nephi 24:6 |
God is increasing in knowledge. Joseph Smith, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p. 120. |
| God is spirit Alma 18:24,28; 22:9,11 |
God has the form of a man. Joseph Smith, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p. 3. |
| Eternal hell Jacob 3:11; 6:10; 2 Nephi 19:16; 28:21-23. |
Hell is not eternal. James Talmage, Articles of Faith, p. 55. |
| Polygamy condemned Jacob 1:15; 2:23,24,27,31;3:5; Mosiah 11:2,4; Ether 10:5,7 |
Polygamy was taught and practiced. Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p. 266 |
12 Essential Mormon Doctrines not Found in the Book of Mormon
If the Book of Mormon is the “most correct book of any on earth” (History of the Church, vol. 4:461), then why does it not contain essential Mormon doctrines such as…
- Church organization
- Plurality of Gods
- Plurality of wives doctrine
- Word of Wisdom
- God is an exalted man
- Celestial marriage
- Men may become Gods
- Three degrees of glory
- Baptism for the dead
- Eternal progression
- The Aaronic Priesthood
- Temple works of washings, anointing, endowments, sealing.
Or the 60 plus false prophesies that come from Joseph Smith.
Here is a quick aside: It is funny — I asked, if there is new revelation opposed to the Book of Mormon, why is the Book of Mormon the only Book that the missionaries would give me? I even asked if I could buy a Doctrine & Covenants. They said I would have to come to the church.
This is when it happened — the older Elder said, “OK I give.”
“What?” Said I…
“I give up. What do you think is truth?”
I laughed. “First, it is not what I think is truth, that matters. What matters is what the Bible says is truth.”
We took about 45 minutes to an hour walking through God’s complete revelation from Genesis to Revelation, the promise and fulfillment of the Redeemer, establishing Jesus’ identity as God and his purpose as the perfect sacrifice and mediator. Then the older Elder says with his voice quivering, “I believe” and the younger laughs again and says “me too”.
Then I had the amazing privilege of leading the two amazing and courageous young men in prayer, thanking Jesus for revealing Himself to them and for these men to turn their lives over to Jesus.
I have to say both of these guys have an amazing amount of guts to make this proclamation.
By the way, here are some great sites to reference:
Christian Apologetics Research Ministry
My Little Mormon Missionaries (Part 2)
In my initial conversations with the Elders, they kept ducking and dodging as I tried to corner them on a particular doctrine or position. They agreed with my logic and admitted that they were probably not as well informed as I was with regard to the specifics of certain Mormon doctrine. By the end of our first conversation, the Elders were basically willing to concede that there were many things that they could not be sure of. However, they said that Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon were “bullet proof” — even amidst certain seeming contradictions. At our next big “sit-down”, I suggested we focus on Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon for a time and see what we could uncover since we were/are all willing to seek the truth. We then dove into the multitude of Joseph Smiths false prophesies (prophesies of the men on the moon, Jesus’ coming, the government being overthrown, the list goes on and on). From here, we turned to their Holey Book (get it - holey?). My question was, “how can a book have 3,934 changes that are not spelling or punctuation corrections, without having the original gold plates for reference”? Many of these changes are significant in doctrine… As we started through the journey of learning how Native American Indians actually don’t become white when they become Mormon, I actually became quite shocked to see these elders (although squirming in their seats - or on my couch, rather)actually did not seem that concerned with the apparent discrepancies and errors in their beliefs. Even after looking at “The Measure of a Prophet” in Deut 18: 20-22, they still stood firm in their conviction. Now keep in mind, I had just spent 2 hours filleting their beliefs.
Next, an Elder explained that these discrepncies could be answered through “continuing revelation”. ”What in the world is that” I thought… I mean hey, what are those guys smoking over their at that missionary house? They went on to say that prophets made mistakes all the time. Sometimes they spoke for God and sometimes, out of ignorance, spoke for their own agenda and belief. After all, aren’t all men imperfect and sinful except for Jesus? I could barely believe my ears. I asked if they could show me a few – wait – how about ONE example of this in the Bible. Unfortunately, our time was up as they had a dinner engagement that they had to attend. We set up a follow up appointment for a few days later.
Next post the finale. Continuing Revelation vs. the Truth. Someone changes their beliefs…
My little Mormon Missionaries (Part 1)
So, one night my wife and I were watching TV when a commercial came on for the LDS… They were offering a DVD and more information on their faith (along with a visit from their people, we found out while on the phone) and I thought, why not? This could be fun!
So, I make the order of the DVD and set up a time for a little visit.
Initially, I have to admit I just wanted the guys in white shirts and bicycles to come over for a shoot-out. I was more than confident that they would end up high tailing it out of the house with their tails between their legs. Fortunately, as our meeting grew nearer, God (and of course my wife) reminded me that my attitude should not be one of slaying the villains, but an attitude of love and grace - so that they might know the truth. Ouch.
Well, when the day of our first visit arrived, Elders Gordy and Timothy showed up (it took three visits for my wife to get their first names out the them). Nice, young, well-groomed, fresh-faced and naive, boys in their early twenties.
I preceded to taking apart their theology. It was quick and concise and half of which they didn’t even seem to know.
My wife asked me afterward why I would ask them a question about their beliefs and the Church of Mormon, and if they happened to hesitate for the slightest nano-second, I would go ahead and answer my own question. Apparently, I spent entirely too much time pointing out inconsistencies with regard to elephants in the Americas, scimitars, silk, and other discrepancies within the Book of Mormon. I then again blew too much hot air discrediting a long line of prophets, apostles and such, Brigham Young as well as various writing such as the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of Great Price.
Unfortunately, I imagine they left feeling a little bit confused and beat up (and maybe even a tad discouraged). I knew they were no closer to the truth. They were still insistent that Joseph Smith was a true Prophet and that the Book of Mormon is the inspired Word of God.
Before the Elders left, we set an appointment to resume our discussion focusing on Joseph Smith and The Book of Mormon.
I will resume on that conversation next post.
Joel Madson (Global Training Network)
Great Teaching on Hebrews 11-12
I went to Overlake Christian Church on Sunday and had the opportunity to hear a great teaching. Joel Madson was there representing Global Training Network. Joel has been a pastor for 20+ years and and brings to the table a boat load of experience and an amazing heart.
The text for the teaching was The Hall of Fame of Faith (Hebrews 11-12)
Joel’s emphasis was great, looking at the the historical characters of the Bible and the amazing commissions and purpose filled lives that were given to them by God. Joel then turned the tables on us and asked us to examine our own lives for 2006.
Have we been satisfied with our walk or do we desire more in 2007?
Are we willing to live like these men and women of faith with the potential that God might ask us;
- To do something that the world might see as foolish
- To give up some thing that might not even be wrong (it might just be God’s second best for us)
- To go somewhere that might not be comfortable to us - or seem to make sense
- To trust God to do the seemingly impossible in our lives
He closed with a great challenge: to get in the game to make a real commitment to the focus of Christ calling and purpose.
Lastly, the only way we can really get in the game is to have a holy desperation for God and His calling in our lives. To come to God in recognition of our frailness and the need for His intervention in our lives.
Here is the Audio link to OCC then choose 12/31/2006 Audio
God bless you all and have a great new year.
Before you make a new years resolution, consider this
Jonathan Edwards teaches us about resolutions
Jonathan Edwards (Not the Presidential candidate) was a dynamic pastor in the First Great Awakening who took his faith extremely seriously. In several sittings over a one-year period, Edwards drafted 70 resolutions by which he governed his life and ministry.
For such a young man, he wrote a life’s code that was amazingly well-rounded. He addressed personal spiritual growth and physical temperance, and matters of attitude, behavior, and relationship. Edwards wanted to live as if he had “already seen the happiness of heaven, and hell torments.”
He pledged that he would “never speak anything but the pure and simple verity.” “Let there be something of benevolence in all that I speak.” In a pledge that he would speak evil of no one, Edwards added the caveat, “except I have some particular good call for it.”
Let’s take a look at some of his resolutions that we should possibly take to heart.
Being sensible that I am unable to do any thing without God’s help, I do humbly in-treat him by his grace to enable me to keep these resolutions, so far as they are agreeable to His will, for Christ’s sake.Resolved, That I will do whatsoever I think to be most to God’s glory, and my own good, profit and pleasure, in the whole of my duration.
Resolved to do whatever I think to be my duty, and most for the good and advantage of mankind in general.
Resolved to do this, whatever difficulties I meet with, how many and how great soever.
Resolved, Never to lose one moment of time, but improve it the most profitable way I possibly can.
Resolved, Never to do any thing, which I should be afraid to do, if it were the last hour of my life.
Resolved, To be endeavoring to find out fit objects of charity and liberality.
Resolved, To maintain the strictest temperance in eating and drinking.
Resolved, Never to do any thing, which if I should see in another, I should count a just occasion to despise Him for, or to think any way the more meanly of Him.
Resolved, To study the Scriptures so steadily, constantly and frequently, as that I may find, and plainly perceive myself to grow in the knowledge of the same.
Resolved, To strive to my utmost every week to be brought higher in religion, and to a higher excercise of grace, than I was the week before.
Resolved, To ask myself at the end of every day, week, month and year, wherein I could possibly in any respect have done better.
Resolved, Frequently to renew the dedication of myself to God, which was made at my baptism, which I solemnly renewed, when I was received into the communion of the church; and which I have solemnly re-made this twelfth day of January, 1722-3.
Resolved, Never hence-forward, till I die, to act as if I were any way my own, but entirely and altogether God’s.
Resolved, I will act so as I think I shall judge would have been best, and most prudent, when I come into the future world.
Resolved, Never to give over, nor in the least to slacken my fight with my corruptions, however unsuccessful I may be.
Resolved, After afflictions, to inquire, what I am the better for them, what good I have got by them, and what I might have got by them.
Well with all that being said I think I should maybe reconsider my new years resolutions to lose weight, get to the gym on a more regular basis and to read the Bible in a year.
Have a great new year!
-
Flickr Photos
More Photos
-
Archives
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (7)
- December 2006 (4)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
